By Prof.
Mahesh P. Bhave
Prof. Mahesh P. Bhave |
I
bought my first shirt without a pocket on the left front panelby accident.
While browsing through the piles of shirts at a well-known retailer, I liked the
lightly striped white shirt – the texture of the fabric, the shape of the collar.
Only when I opened the package and wore it did I realize it had no pocket. I
thought this was a manufacturing defect, and that I should return or exchange
it.
When
I revisited the store, however, I found that this was no mistake. In the
language of software, this was no bug, but a feature, by design. What are they
thinking, I thought?In visits to other stores, I confirmed that this was indeed
a trend. In retailer after retailer, across brands, European designers were
producing shirts without pockets. For a while, I noticed this was confined to
European designers, not Americans.
Soon
the Americans started manufacturing shirts without pockets, for instance,
Calvin Klein and Ralph Lauren. And I started examining shirts carefully. On
many occasions, when the dapper store salespersons try to encourage me to buy
shirts, I point out to the absence of the pocket, and ask them: Why? They say,
“European style.” No explanation beyond it. I’ve queried salespersons at
Nordstrom, Macy’s, Pink, and more.
About
this particular shirt, though I like it, I find myself avoiding using it
because I cannot carry a pen with it. Coins may go in trouser pockets, but not
pens. And every time this occasion presents itself, I mildly blame myself for
not examining the shirt before buying it. Of course, I swear more at the designers,
manufacturers, and retailers who have foisted this crazy idea on all, or at
least half, of humankind. I believe I was duped in a minor way. Why should I
check that a shirt has a pocket? Do shirts not have buttons?
Experience
tells me that my decisions as a consumer do not reflect the majority, and I am
careful not to extrapolate from me to the universe. In social science research
design-speak, the external validity
of my personal conclusions is suspect. On the pocket issue, however, I believe
I am on firmer wicket.
Are
they trying to save on cloth? I wonder. Are they trying to eliminate the hassle
of aligning the pin stripes of the pocket with the rest of the shirt during
manufacturing by eliminating the pocket altogether? Maybe they are doing us
consumers a favor so that no leaky ballpointpen has the opportunity to stain
the pocket. Why is it that the more expensive the shirt, the greater the
likelihood of a missing pocket?
Indian
shirt-makersare astonishing; they frequently have pockets with covering flaps
and buttons on both shirt panels, and for full sleeve shirts, they have pockets
on the sleeves as well, with contrast colored piping, especially if the shirt
is the tight fitting kind for teenagers, ultra slim fit. Such shirts are
popular among the youthful gangs at the Focus Mall in Calicut, and all malls I
suppose across India. Even India-made T-shirts have pockets in front, case in
point, Colour Plus, and this no
European or American does.
Indian
shirt-makers know no frugality when it comes to pockets, though they will
squeeze every inch of cloth from the waist, sleeves, and around the arm in the
name of style and economy. Bend down, and your shirt will come out from the
back; lift you arm, and it will come out from the side, or tear – no concern
for comfort, never mind the hot and humid weather.
In
Bangalore, I saw a good quality cotton kurta,
and bought it. I prefer white ones with no embellishments around the neck and
no collar, strictly plain, asnightwear.Now with kurtas, I have had ones with only right side pocket, ones with right
and left side pockets, and ones with variable cloth quality. This one had right and left pockets, and a front pocket, and a
good thread count. I was delighted. Comfort, no issue – if the salesperson
recommends size 38, buy 44.
Bottom line: I think customer interest took fourth
place, and no market research was done, when someone ultra-smart at some
dressmaker – maybe with an MBA, in the interest of smoothing out the supply
chain, and lower costs – decided to eliminate pockets on dress shirts. I don’t
understand the rationale.
My silent curses go their way frequently. I hope
these pocket-less shirt-makers take a beating in the market with customers like
me deliberately choosing against them, no matter how grand and uppitythe brand.
Mahesh P. Bhave is a Visiting Professor of Strategy in Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
I fully agree. All my best shirts don't have pockets and it's really annoying! In India, till some years back you could easily find Tees with pockets. Sadly no more. What is happening?!
ReplyDeleteRudra Sensarma
With male bodies getting more sculpted, shirts w/o pockets become more appealing. one can extend the logic based on how some bollywood heroes inspire people not to even wear shirts!! one for extension - how about trousers without pockets? i think there some brands with real flat front, no-pocket variety trousers.
ReplyDeleteThe article motivated me forward this article to my friends in leading apparel retail firm(one MNC and one Indian), handling profiles of designing and quality assurance and get their viewpoint on this.They shared as, cost may not the primary motive( especially w.r.t. pocket), but may a time accidentally we start something and it gets momentum. Generally the styles are approved from the Retailer(buyer and technical) and the outsourced vendor manufactures it in supervision of Quality assurance team. Mistakenly(or sometime intentional), the approved quality plan deviates.Previously retailer use to cancel the order but in past few year they have changed their strategy.They take it on SOR(sell or replace) and keep it on stores.Sales results many a time is surprising, as customer welcomes it as innovation(or style).Many a time retailers had even place repeat orders for mistakenly made merchandise as it got momentum and became a style.
ReplyDeleteProf Bhave,
ReplyDeleteDo you really think that the pockets were removed keeping your pen stains in mind? Really. This is again one of those cheap tricksters who to save time in the production line did away with the pocket. I know it sounds cynical but its true. The pocketless shirts are here to say, sadly :(