MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: NEWS, VIEWS & IDEAS

Views expressed in the blog are the personal views of the authors, not the views of Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode

Saturday, November 9, 2013

SHAMELESSLY CHANGELESS


By Prof. Mahesh P. Bhave
Prof. Mahesh P. Bhave

If you go to Reliance Fresh or Big Bazaar, and are about to pay for the merchandize you have bought, chances are greater than even that the person at the cash register has no change to give you. He will ask you if you could produce the exact amount.

If asked as a sheepish request, I am able to occasionally forgive. Yet most times, the tone is: what kind of a shopper are you that you do not carry exact change for my convenience?

I once tried telling the film-star wannabe behind the cash register in Pune – tight shirt, even tighter trousers, and hair slickly perfect – that it was his and his store’s duty to always have change before letting customers stand in the line. He did not say anything. But his expression was: Your advice for your own galaxy; this is India. In lieu of change, he offered me Cadbury’s candy.

Despite Consumer Behavior courses taught en masse in MBA programs, customer centricity is absent in new Indian retail (and elsewhere in India too, but more of that in future articles). I am all for the convenience of open shelves, and putting things in the basket, or taking things out of it, until I reach the point of payment. Lines are bad enough, but I could do without the quasi-robots on the other side of the counter.

The vaani, the corner grocery proprietor who has been replaced by the multi-location retailers’ institutional services, was otherwise. He knew how to treat each customer professionally yet personally while working fast. He wrapped whatever you ordered, in folded paper with magic fingers, and nothing spilled. And whatever had to be placed in paper bags, he wrapped a string around it from a spool hanging at the roof. The knots at the top of the bag, and the breaking of the thread with a quick tug in a single movement, were art. Everything ordered was customized by weight, touched by hand, alas – I ran my fingers through the wheat and rice in open bags – and wrapped. I don’t miss those days, yet cannot help admire, from memory, the deft efficiency of that retailer, and contrast with the brassy sass of today.

In the US, I cannot imagine any retailer running out of change. At the turn of every shift, the new cashier comes with well-wrapped bundles of coins of all denominations, empties them into the drawer, and only then begins checking out customers. All transactions are correct to the penny – no chocolates as coin. Why Indian retailers don’t think it important to carry sufficient change in their registers surprises me, and I have a theory about it.

When buying from the vaani, we dealt with the owner-proprietor, the CEO of his own shop. Naturally, he acted responsibly like any business owner or senior executive. The staff at today’s cash registers is like machines – low level, likely part-time employees, and with no career trajectory to look forward to. The customer belongs to a system of impersonal, quasi-mechanized transactions. The check out staff clock hours, get paid, and leave, and stay out of trouble. They perceive only an indirect association of any customer to their own livelihood.

Meanwhile, the business of the grocery store has moved higher to the store manager, who supervises a staff of hundreds. The Big Bazaars of India have yet to mature to the point that all their employees are professionals. No senior manager has considered change at the cash register as an important customer service issue, though in theory they have learned to pay attention to customer “touch points.”

To be sure, debit cards can eliminate the change hassle, but not many in India use cards; the swipe terminal is seldom prominently placed at checkout.

On IIM Kozhikode campus, we have a Milma booth, the retail store belonging to Kerala cooperative milk marketing federation, similar to the Amul Milk cooperative, that carries a variety of milk products from pedhas to ice cream. I typically need a half-liter milk pack (3% milk fat, homogenized) from the store every two days, and occasionally 200 ml curd (or yogurt). I used to normally buy the milk for `17.50 and since the store typically did not have the needed ` 2.50 in change, the franchisee and I kept the outstanding balance in our heads, and adjusted the amount over weeks. Then I tired of keeping track. If I bought both the curd (` 22) and the milk, the amount came to ` 39.50. I was willing to forego the ` 0.50 in the interest of relieving my mind of accounting; it was easy to give two 20 rupee notes or four 10 rupee notes and be done.

This has continued for several weeks now, and my mind is at rest. Yet this thought persists: If I carry candy in my pocket, will the toll-booth or retailer accept that as change?

Mahesh P. Bhave is a visiting professor of strategy at IIM Kozhikode. 

6 comments:

  1. I have to report similar experiences. On an average, I get much better reception if I shop directly after office hours (when I am better and properly dressed?) than on the weekends (when I am happily and shabbily dressed). The episodes of not having loose change are common, and I suspect it is just an attempt by the poorly-paid-but-socially-better-situated individual at the counter to line his pockets. ("his" is intentional, because I have never experienced female workers to act like this, snobbery notwithstanding).

    To me, it is not just about the loose change; it goes beyond petty profiteering at the counters. Basically, it is about the retail enterprise making the distinction between the "customer" and the "consumer". If you are a consumer, you are just a statistical entity. You are not real. So it is like ... "we are giving you such a great variety at such fabulous prices; and you want good service too?". And if you are a customer, the enterprise probably wants you, but the guy at the counter is thinking, ..."you have to be both rich and crazy and dumb to shop here, because I don't. So why should you grudge leaving a few rupees behind?".

    So the snobbery - though not as widespread - is not accidental. It is a useful ploy to put you in your place, so your behavior loses its variance. The guys who own the place - typically those whose last names rhyme with hegemony - look at it as a play of massive capital, advantageous locations and supply-side contracts. The staff is hired from urban, academically disinclined youngsters with smart exteriors because they have to deal with the 'defined' version of the customer. They receive minimal training (2-5 days based on my casual enquiries), but during that period, they are told about what the 'good' customers look like.

    In a lighter vein, may be that explains the 'yes sir' treatment I get during weekdays, whereas weekends provide me with a dose of reality and keep me sane.

    Milind Padalkar

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree largely with the premise: "Disenchantment of cashiers/ salespeople with customers at large retail shops"

    However, I argue that it is not an Indian phenomenon rather it is a Walmart et all phenomenon seeping into Indian shopping experience. The signal of this phenomenon in India as implied by the author is being "changeless" while signals in the latter contexts are extreme reluctance, rudeness and facial expressions.

    Anubha Shekhar

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have to report similar experiences. On an average, I get much better reception if I shop directly after office hours (when I am better and properly dressed?) than on the weekends (when I am happily and shabbily dressed). The episodes of not having loose change are common, and I suspect it is just an attempt by the poorly-paid-but-socially-better-situated individual at the counter to line his pockets. ("his" is intentional, because I have never experienced female workers to act like this, snobbery notwithstanding).

    To me, it is not just about the loose change; it goes beyond petty profiteering at the counters. Basically, it is about the retail enterprise making the distinction between the "customer" and the "consumer". If you are a consumer, you are just a statistical entity. You are not real. So it is like ... "we are giving you such a great variety at such fabulous prices; and you want good service too?". And if you are a customer, the enterprise probably wants you, but the guy at the counter is thinking, ..."you have to be both rich and crazy and dumb to shop here, because I don't. So why should you grudge leaving a few rupees behind?".

    So the snobbery - though not as widespread - is not accidental. It is a useful ploy to put you in your place, so your behavior loses its variance. The guys who own the place - typically those whose last names rhyme with hegemony - look at it as a play of massive capital, advantageous locations and supply-side contracts. The staff is hired from urban, academically disinclined youngsters with smart exteriors because they have to deal with the 'defined' version of the customer. They receive minimal training (2-5 days based on my casual enquiries), but during that period, they are told about what the 'good' customers look like.

    In a lighter vein, may be that explains the 'yes sir' treatment I get during weekdays, whereas weekends provide me with a dose of reality and keep me sane.

    Milind Padalkar

    ReplyDelete
  4. A perfect ending to a great article Sir. In today's days of utmost concern over customer satisfaction, this practice of replacing change with candies is an extreme violation of the same and goes unwanted by many customers who value even a single penny.

    ReplyDelete
  5. May be "being changeless" is part of the plan.
    If Cadbury Eclairs is treated as default currency, it might be that the FMCG company has employed a clever "push" tactic. What else could explain it being ubiquitous at every retail store?. Of course, almost everyone likes the candy but there can be more to it.
    What if the FMCG company (currently Kraft foods) sells the candy (the ones sold loose) 'at cost' to the retailers and let them keep the profit that emnates from the "changeless" transaction. In case of a large retailer, may be the FMCG firm would have entered into a pact with the retail chain, which allows the staff at the billing counter keep the profits. The profits to the retailer/counter staff in such a case may be quite substantial. For a retail outlet with an avg 25-30 transactions/counter/hour, this could mean an easy profit of min Rs100-150 per day, assuming the staff works at an eight hour shift. With a little bit of Marketing I know, I feel the FMCG company doesn't lose a bit in the process. It is able to keep itself continuously engaged with its customers & serve a larger diverse group of consumers - avoiding price wars or direct competition with rivals.
    But the fallout of this tactic, when the staff tend to overdo this practice, may not have been anticipated.. Or may be its not to be taken heed of - since consumer disgruntlement will only be against the retail chain and not with the candy maker.

    Chacko Jacob

    ReplyDelete
  6. 'Customer Centricity' or 'Customer is King' are buzzwords in the lexicon of the B schools. In reality the customer is taken for granted.
    With the impending birthday of my better half, I knew she was looking ahead for a gift; a Levis jeans. It would kill the surprise should I take her to the store get it fitted and all that. So I thought of Gift Coupons.
    Levis offer gift coupons to its US customers but not in India (don't mention discrimination .. :( )
    Well, got a better idea; go to Shoppers Stop - they have Gift Coupons and have Levis outlet. Bingo...
    One could buy say 5000 worth of coupon and what ever the cost of the jeans the balance could be refunded. Right, Wrong!
    They offer coupons but the balance amount they would not refund...nope! You need to buy stuff from them... whatever! Now, I don't want to buy other stuff from there....
    Customer is King.. all bumkum ..

    ReplyDelete

Please leave your name even if you use the anonymous option.