By Prof. Mahesh P. Bhave
Prof. Mahesh P. Bhave |
Around mid-1980s, I was puzzled by a simple question: Why is
India poor? What are the causes of the wealth and poverty of nations? I
realized only later the very question prompted Adam Smith’s 1776 classic, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.
One conclusion I reached was that entrepreneurs were
responsible for wealth creation. The state had a supportive and an enabling
role. The state, I hoped, would at least not be an impediment.
Assuming entrepreneurship is the way, what prevents
entrepreneurs from starting new ventures quickly? I reached a surprising
conclusion – absence of the right information, in a timely way, resulting in
uncertainty reduction. The faster the uncertainty reduction, the closer
entrepreneurs were to business launch.
The right information was often with people, not in books,
and not on the Internet, which did not exist at the time I was researching the
subject. But few people with the right information were at hand, within the family,
in the same region, or were peers in the same organization or university. Some key
people were oceans away. Some knowledge was arcane in scientific journals, and
inaccessible due to the inability to understand.
How to bridge distances and link with the right people? I
concluded that the absence of telephony infrastructure was among the major causes
of lack of entrepreneurship, and therefore wealth creation. And India believed well
into early 1990s that telephone infrastructure was a luxury, unimportant
compared to other needs.
India also believed in the state-as-entrepreneur, and
invested heavily in public sector undertakings (PSU). Nehruvian socialism full
of good intentions ruled. The nation turned to the state – maabaapsarkar – for many of its needs.
Certain communities nevertheless managed to overcome these
limitations, and entrepreneurial culture developed within family networks. Dinner
tables became boardrooms. Naturally, such business families maintained cordial
relationships with the uber-entrepreneur,
the state.
Photo courtesy of Mike Keefe from Denver Post |
Fast-forward twenty plus years. Now telephone access is a
solved problem, and people anywhere in the world are reachable. From the remote
hills of Kozhikode, Kerala, I can call Barack Obama or Sachin Tendulkar, and
they could call me!The Internet has made reference and background information gathering
magically easy. Social media likely accelerates inter-personal
networks. Does this access plenty spur grass-root, entrepreneurial economic
activity? It should, it likely has.
As the barriers to uncertainty reduction in the
entrepreneurial process have fallen, what is the new constraint to entrepreneurial
activity? Of course, entrepreneurs make many judgments beyond getting information.
They consider timing, segment customers, estimate demand, marshal resources, and
evaluate the implications of the falling rupee. Above all, they require know-how in addition to know-what, which is difficult to
acquire.
Nevertheless, one of the major barriers to entrepreneurial
wealth creation … now stares us in the mirror each day.
Mahesh P. Bhave is a Visiting Professor of Strategy at IIM Kozhikode
Mahesh P. Bhave is a Visiting Professor of Strategy at IIM Kozhikode
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave your name even if you use the anonymous option.